There's always something News from the judicial scene.
colleague told me about a case that he was concerned. The colleague runs a blog where he writes sometimes his frustration with the self-righteous blogger scene of the soul. In June / July 2010, he wrote ironically a champion of freedom of expression encompassing, covering not-necessarily-willed on by the speculation personal and professional details. In a subordinate clause and the real name of this constant critic has called the legal profession. Fast Acting as the firefighters went to a representative of this then criticized the profession, to the colleagues, the attribution prohibited. When my friend is not listed in that good immediately responded, we wanted an injunction , Has threatened to apply by mail and telephone. My friend was tired of meanness and changed in his blog without acknowledging any legal obligation to the surname of the named in the letter.
prompt he received a call from the lawyer of the named that one is very happy with the change, everything is alright and the interim order had to be stopped, however, would be through the submission of the application for this injunction incurred legal costs and should share but the calling of the lawyer named and my friend.
This sudden kindness of calling colleagues did my friend but hear everything.
He took the files at the District Court called Saxon and behold, the district court had already made a final decision in the Act, in which the application was rejected in full. This decision was the colleague sent but not yet.
In other words, the enemy had quickly as your fellow firefighters a completely botched application filed for his mistake and wanted to just do not stand alone.
remembered my friend's colleagues strongly to the familiar tactic of the subscription traps operators: They want to enforce vigorously and with strong words, a non-existing claims.
My colleague has now been ordered for himself and requested a formal rejection of the request for an interim injunction. The costs (including their own legal costs) then the applicant should be imposed, which is so well done. And if not then should be paid, then he needs a car yourself without Schufa